Bubbles

Bubbles#

Following Blanchard and Watson (1982), consider the stochastic expectational difference equation

(432)#\[y_t = \lambda P_t y_{t+1} + x_t,\quad |\lambda|<1\]

where \(x_t\) is a stationary autoregressive process

(433)#\[x_t = \rho x_{t-1} + \epsilon_t,\quad |\rho|<1\]

where \(\epsilon_t\) is a white noise that is fundamental for \(x_t\). In (432), \(P_t\) is the linear least squares projection operator, conditioned on information known at \(t\). An application of formula (282) shows that the stationary solution of (432) given (433) is

(434)#\[y_t = \frac{1}{1-\lambda\rho}x_t\]

Blanchard and Watson noted that in addition to the stationary solution (434) there are many nonstationary solutions. These nonstationary solutions can be characterized as follows. Let \(c_t\) be any martingale, that is, let \(c_t\) be any stochastic process that satisfies \(P_t c_{t+1} = c_t\). Then a solution of (432) is

(435)#\[y_t = \frac{1}{1-\lambda\rho}x_t + \left(\frac{1}{\lambda}\right)^t c_t\]

That (435) is a solution of (432) can be verified directly.

Three examples of martingales \(c_t\) can usefully be given. A first is the constant \(c_t = c\) for all \(t\). This is the sort of deterministic bubble encountered in Chapter IX. A second is the one proposed by Blanchard and Watson, namely, the process

\[\begin{split} c_{t+1} = \begin{cases} c_t/\pi & \text{with prob } \pi, \quad 0<\pi<1 \\ 0 & \text{with prob } 1-\pi \end{cases} \end{split}\]

The process \(c_{t+1}\) is readily verified to be a martingale. A third example is generated from the \(x_t\) process itself. Simply set \(c_t = \rho^{-t}x_t\), which is a martingale in light of (433): \(P_t c_{t+1} = \rho^{-(t+1)}P_t x_{t+1} = \rho^{-(t+1)}\rho x_t = c_t\).

In Chapter XIV, we study a model in which a transversality condition serves to make setting \(c_t= 0\) the only admissible solution for a version of equation (432). There has recently been work designed to estimate and test models in which there are insufficient boundary conditions to justify setting \(c_t = 0\). (See Blanchard and Watson (1982), Meese (1986), Sargent and Wallace (1985), and Hamilton and Whiteman (1985).) Such models have been proposed as candidates for understanding the stock market, foreign exchange rates, and hyperinflations.

See also

Decomposing an Explosive Autoregression applies the same forward solution to a scalar explosive autoregression and reads the two resulting solutions as two ways of representing a nonstationary process.